Tuesday, 19 June 2012

Living with the enemy......

There is much publicity - and rightly so about the proposed wind power stations in the most beautiful and scenic parts of Scotland. Last years I had the privilege of taking part in Alan Sloman's 'Wake for the Wild' protest which opined the death of Scotland's wild land due to the proliferation of wind power stations. It took place on Dunmaglass estate which is beautiful (or it was beautiful last time I looked - that will change) and part of Alan's motivation was that Dunmaglass is bang on the route that he has taken on one of his many The Great Outdoors Challenges. Dunmaglass had a special place in his heart.


Over the years, Alan watched as more and more wind power stations appeared in the scenery that he loved and then when consent was given for Dunmaglass it was the last straw and he felt the need to make a high profile protest and he succeeded. Ultimately though and he knew this at the time, it was too late. Dunmaglass had already been approved and so the wind power station steamroller rolls on.


A massive development at Allt Duine adjacent to the Cairngorm National Park is on the cards. There is talk today of a massive development on the slopes of Ben Wyvis - an iconic Munro north of Inverness and so it goes on. People know where the Cairngorms are, they are in the minds eye of everyone who loves the Scottish outdoors. The same people instantly know what you are talking about when you say the word Munro and everyone who comes to visit Scotland for its outstanding beauty and wild character has their own favourite spot.

There is much talk too about the visual impact of large scale developments and whether or not they will deter tourists from coming to the area and thus affect the local economy. Local newspapers are full of people who say that wind power stations don't bother them and that it wouldn't affect their enjoyment of the area. So does that make it OK? No I'm afraid it doesn't. The views of visitors to the area are crucial, but I sometimes think that campaigners miss the fact that the people who live in Scotland don't get to go home at the end of their two week holiday and forget that these turbines exist. As more turbines are built, more people will have to  live with them and their effects. They don't only get built in remote wild areas, they get built right next to peoples houses and right next to roads which are used by thousands of local people to commute.

I have the good fortune to live in a rural area about eight miles south of Elgin in Morayshire. It's not anywhere that most people would recognise as being 'iconic' or 'of outstanding natural  beauty' but it's where I live and I love living here. I look out of my window (that was designed to make the most of the view) and I see fields and a hill called Brown Muir as a backdrop.

I love watching the sunset over Brown Muir. I love watching the way the hill changes colour when the heather blooms each August. I love watching the cloud and mist roll in down the glen and I love the way that the snow fills in all of the little nooks and crannies as it falls. I walked Brown Muir a lot when I was training for the Pennine Way and it has a special place in My Heart because it's the view I see every single day of my life when I open the blinds each morning.





So the perceptive amongst you may see where this is going. In July last year, just as I was finishing walking The Pennine Way, I got word that there was a plan to build a wind power station on Brown Muir. To cut a long story very short, we protested, emailed, petitioned and did everything we could along with our neighbours to try and dissuade the developers from going ahead but last week they submitted a Section 36 application to the Scottish Government to build 19 turbines, each 125m high. They have 'consulted' locally for what it was worth with pictures of dandelions and polar bears to sway the uninitiated. They used the usual tactics of asking questions which were designed to elicit a sympathetic reply and offering 'community benefits' which are otherwise known as 'bribes'.

I occasionally encounter the local landowner at business meetings and am torn between wondering how he sleeps nights knowing that he is selling off his family's silver to line his pockets and thinking that it must be difficult to resist when large sums of money get dropped in your lap for doing not very much.

So where are we?
It's difficult to stir up much national support because we aren't a 'romantic' or 'high profile' site like Allt Duine or Ben Wyvis. There are so many other protests going on and we feel very much like a poor relation
It's difficult to get across the idea that you aren't just being a NIMBY. I don't want them in my back yard - I don't want them in anyone's backyard.
It's difficult to stir the feelings of people who aren't directly affected by them.
It's difficult to keep up momentum when we all have lives to live, businesses to run and full time jobs to go to.
It's difficult to refute the propaganda put forward by the multi million pound developers.

Moray has its fair share of wind turbines and they have crept in over the years pretty much under the radar of most local residents. Now they are here to stay do we stand much chance of stopping the building of more? The development at Brown Muir is symptomatic of the developers going for the 'easy' option that they think won't attract any large scale objections.

The Scottish Government has made it known that it wants wind power stations built to meet their targets. They bang on a lot about only allowing ones that are sensitive to the environment and taking each application on a case by case basis but they are only playing lip service to the view of anyone except the developers and landowners who stand to gain from them.

We are normal little people with normal little lives. We don't have hundreds of thousands of pounds to spend fighting this and we don't have unlimited time available to us. We need as many objections as possible to be submitted on the basis that Moray already has enough turbines in existence and in the planning stages and that the visual impact of this development on the local environment will be substantial.

In my view Alex Salmond wants this to be his shot at immortality. He wants to be remembered as the First Minister who set these targets and then met them. He will certainly be remembered.....

High above Golspie in Sutherland there is a statue of the Duke of Sutherland.



The Duke of Sutherland is generally regarded as being the architect of the Highland Clearances during which people were forcibly cleared from the land by rich landowners to make way for sheep which were far more profitable. It remains one of the most shameful chapters in Scottish history. It is not unknown for some people to show their disdain for the Duke of Sutherland's actions by walking the hill to his statue and then pissing on it.

In my view, Alex Salmond is as guilty now as the Duke of Sutherland was then of using the landscape as a cash cow and once again it's the rich landowners who stand to benefit. One day when Alex Salmond has his own statue (I have no doubt that he'll build his own if nobody else does) I will have no hesitation in going up to it and demonstrating my feelings in the most obvious way possible......

Read more about the Brown Muir proposal here.

Objections must be lodged before 20th July 2012 by the following means:
By post to:
The Scottish Government, Energy Consents Unit, 4th Floor, 5 Atlantic
Quay, 150 Broomielaw, Glasgow G2 8LU


By email to:
representations@scotland.gsi.gov.uk

5 comments:

  1. Well said, Janet.
    Another slick production from the developer.

    This is typical "developer speak":
    "The number of pink-footed geese predicted to collide with turbines was calculated to be 85 birds per year, 0.74 % of the mean number in the local population and 0.16 % of the regional population. This level of mortality is assessed as being of low magnitude and not significant."

    Well, I would say it *is* pretty significant to the 2,125 geese that are to be killed in the 25 year lifetime of the wind farm.

    These cold, clinical analyses of future deaths has a fascist ring about it.

    But then, these developers don't give a shit. They'll be trousering their millions of pounds of subsidies that you and I will be paying for.

    They won't be living next to the wind farm. They'll be living it up somewhere without turbines.

    I think I'll join you and piss on Salmond's statue. We should erect one outside his Parliament building, to make sure he can see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Alan, it looks like we may have to form an orderly queue........

      Delete
  2. Let's not wait for the statue.
    (I was at the wake with Al carrying the coffin), let's just go and piss on Salmond.
    I'd put the bugger in the stocks along with the rich land owners.
    What they are doing is a crime against nature, that sadly will only become apparent to the masses when they have lost what they had. :(

    Good write up by the way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For the first time in four years they refused one recently in Caithness and the grounds for refusal was that it would be intrusive in the landscape. Yes - I laughed too!!
      Read here:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-18422752
      They said:
      "The Scottish government wants to see the right developments in the right places

      "Scottish planning policy is clear that the design and location of any wind farm should reflect the scale and character of the landscape and should be considered environmentally acceptable.

      "The impact of this proposed wind farm on the landscape, and the impact it would have on the homes of those who live closest to it, is too great."

      On those grounds I would say that the rest of the Highlands is now safe from development.........yeah right!
      Brown Muir is 339 metres so how they can think that 19 125 metre turbines on top is in scale with the environment is beyond me.

      Delete
    2. Have you seen this? Lincolnshire County Council has issued a planning statement saying in effect that the wind farms can shove off:
      LINK

      There are links on that web page to download the pdf's giving the exact statement and also the conditions for the developers should a wind farm actually go ahead. It includes a 2km separation from houses and the complete removal of all the concrete bases at the end of the wind farm's life.

      Delete